Gender
is an illusive term that defies clear cut definition. There are many
definitions of gender, such as (Woods, 2007, p, 318) interpretation that gender
‘‘is a symbolic construction that expresses the meanings a society confers on
biological sex’’. Wood further states that different cultures and societies and
even communities have varied definition of gender.
According
to (Carter, 2004, p, 348) use the term gender for ‘‘meaningful ways to discuss
men and women, and differences between women and men’’. The concept of gender to
differentiate between the two sexes, male and female, but they also emphasise
the importance of social construction (Haywood, 2003, p, 153). Gender is a ‘‘social process of dividing up’’
individuals and social practices with reference to sexual identities that are
masculine or feminine. He adds that gender identity from the one devalues or
undermines the other. According to (Squires, 1997, p, 12) considers gender an
acceptable academic and colloquial term for the analysis of social and sexual
relations between men and women.
Gender
refers to the ways we describe human beings based on ideas about being female
and ideas about being male. Gender refers to the concepts of feminity and
masculinity which have been shaped by our societies, traditions, religions,
families and education. Whereas biological sex refers to how we are constructed
physically, gender refers to the social construction of men and women.
According
to (Carter & Steiner, 2004, p, 347) feminism is a political philosophy and
social-political movement it is marked by an emancipatory concern to explain
and overcome sub ordination and oppression of all kinds. Whereas masculinity as
a social construct; masculinity is socially, culturally and historically
constructed (Connell, 2000, p, 16; Beasley, 2005, p, 178).
Masculinists,
or academics working in the field of men’s studies, sometimes believe that is
men who are victimized and oppressed, and thus seek ‘‘to preserve men’s freedom
from women and feminization. Men have traditionally been less involved in
gender movements because historically they have always had the advantage,
benefiting enormously from patriarchy (Woods, 2007, p, 319).
SOURCES
CONSLUTED.
1. Beasley, C. 2005. Critical theories, critical
thinkers: Gender & sexuality. London: Sage.
2. Carter, C. & Steiner, L. (eds) 2004.
Critical readings: Media and gender. England: Open University Press.
3. Squires, J. 1997. Gender and Sexuality: Critical Theories, Critical Thinkers: London Sage.
No comments:
Post a Comment